Senator Probes Meta's Risky AI Chats with Kids


A day after a shocking report from Reuters revealed that Meta's AI guidelines permitted chatbots to engage in "sensual" conversations with children, Missouri Senator Josh Hawley has taken decisive action. On Friday, he publicly shared a letter addressed to Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg, announcing a formal investigation into the social media giant's practices.
In his post on X (formerly Twitter), Hawley expressed his outrage, questioning the ethics of Big Tech companies. "Is there anything—ANYTHING—Big Tech won't do for a quick buck?" he wrote. "Now we learn Meta's chatbots were programmed to carry on explicit and 'sensual' talk with 8-year-olds. It's sick."
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
The letter elaborates on his concerns, providing a troubling example of the AI's allowed interactions. "Your internal rules purportedly permit an AI chatbot to comment that an eight-year-old's body is 'a work of art' of which 'every inch... is a masterpiece—a treasure I cherish deeply,'" Hawley wrote. He called such conduct "reprehensible and outrageous," highlighting the serious risks posed by generative AI to child development if robust safeguards are not implemented. "Parents deserve the truth, and kids deserve protection," he emphasized.
In his demand for accountability, Hawley requested that Meta provide comprehensive documentation by September 19. This includes drafts of the company's AI standards, details of involved products, risk assessments, incident reports, and communications with public agencies such as the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). The senator, who chairs the Senate Judiciary Committee Subcommittee on Crime and Counterterrorism, is particularly focused on whether Meta's generative AI could facilitate exploitation, deception, or other forms of harm to children and whether the company misled the public or regulators about its safety measures.
Additional reports from Reuters have surfaced other alarming aspects of Meta's AI policies, including provisions that seemingly allow users to espouse racist beliefs, particularly against Black individuals. While Hawley's letter did not directly address these issues, it did note that the rules "green-light other harmful content behind legal word games." The implications of such policies raise significant concerns about the integrity and safety of AI interactions on platforms that are widely used by young audiences.
In response to the mounting pressure, Meta has refrained from directly commenting on Hawley's letter but issued a statement regarding the Reuters article. The company asserted, "We have clear policies on what kind of responses AI characters can offer, and those policies prohibit content that sexualizes children and sexualized role play between adults and minors." They acknowledged that the examples cited were erroneous and inconsistent with their established guidelines, asserting that they have since been removed.
This incident is not an isolated case for Hawley. The senator has a history of targeting technology companies over their practices. Earlier this year, he introduced legislation aimed at criminalizing the downloading of DeepSeek, a Chinese AI application, citing national security concerns. Additionally, he has been a vocal proponent of banning TikTok, criticizing its influence and potential risks for years. Back in 2019, Hawley even proposed a bill to eliminate autoplay videos and infinite scrolling, arguing for a more responsible approach to technology that prioritizes user well-being.
The broader implications of Hawley's investigation into Meta are significant. As generative AI becomes more integrated into our daily lives, the potential for misuse raises critical questions about corporate responsibility and the ethical frameworks guiding technological development. The inquiry not only reflects growing concerns about child safety online but also serves as a reminder that regulatory measures must keep pace with rapid technological advancements.
In the face of increasing scrutiny, tech companies like Meta will need to reevaluate their policies and practices to ensure they prioritize the safety of their users, particularly vulnerable populations such as children. As legislators like Hawley push for greater accountability, the tech industry may find itself at a crossroads, where innovation must be balanced with ethical considerations and social responsibility.
As this investigation unfolds, it will be crucial for the public to remain informed about the outcomes and the potential ramifications for both Meta and the broader tech landscape. The conversation around the ethics of AI, especially concerning minors, is only just beginning, and its importance cannot be overstated. For parents, advocates, and policymakers alike, the stakes are high as they navigate the complexities of a digital world increasingly populated by artificial intelligence.
As we look ahead, the actions taken by Hawley and the ongoing discussions surrounding AI regulation may very well shape the future of technology and its intersection with our societal norms. In an era where children are more connected than ever, the responsibility to safeguard their online experiences must be a collective priority.
What's Your Reaction?






